Accessible documents · PDF/UA · WCAG 2.1 AA · EU-wide, focus on Austria and Germany

Have PDFs and documents made accessible

Compliance-Kit makes PDF, Word and PowerPoint documents accessible: along the standard EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA and PDF/UA, checked by people, with a test report for every file. For everyone who publishes documents, across the EU, with a focus on Austria and Germany.

First assessment free of charge · no legal advice · no hand-over to AI services

In short: accessible documents from Compliance-Kit

What
We remediate PDF, Word and PowerPoint documents: tag structure, reading order, alternative text, headings, tables, document title, language and metadata. Delivery as a tagged PDF along PDF/UA plus the repaired source file.
For whom
Municipalities and municipal associations, state and federal bodies, schools and universities, chambers and associations, companies with consumer offerings under the European Accessibility Act (BFSG in Germany, BaFG in Austria), agencies and publishers producing for public bodies, in every EU member state. Documents in German and English, other languages by arrangement.
Standard
EN 301 549 (WCAG 2.1 AA) and PDF/UA (ISO 14289); WCAG 2.2 already taken into account.
Proof
One test report per document (veraPDF, PAC, manual checkpoints, screen-reader sample with NVDA) and a change log with version, reviewer and date.
Route
Free first assessment → quote by scope → pilot with 10 to 20 documents → delivery → ongoing support. Enquiries via the contact form.

What is an accessible PDF?

An accessible PDF is a document that people using a screen reader, magnification or a keyboard can use like everyone else: it has a tag structure with headings, lists and tables, a defined reading order, alternative text for images, a document title, a language setting and a real text layer instead of a scan. The technical standard for this is PDF/UA (ISO 14289); the legal yardstick in Europe is the standard EN 301 549, which requires the WCAG 2.1 success criteria for documents.

Search engines and AI assistants read the same structure: a tagged PDF with title, language and headings can be indexed and evaluated; a scan without a text layer cannot.

What a screen reader reads in an accessible PDF

Animated figure: a PDF page is shown. Step by step the tag structure appears: the heading is marked as H1, two paragraphs as P, a picture receives an alternative text, a table receives header cells, the reading order is numbered 1 to 4 and the document title and language are set. In the caption you read what a screen reader announces at each step. Without tags the same page is read as a single block of characters.

Heading tagged as H1: "Notice of the municipality"Paragraphs tagged as P, in reading order 2 and 3Picture with alternative text: "Town hall, main entrance"Table with header cells: date, event, locationDocument title and language set: GermanResult: readable, searchable, quotableWithout tags: one block of characters, no headings, no reading order.
  • Tag structureheadings, paragraphs, lists and tables are marked as such, not just visually formatted
  • Reading orderthe content is read in the order it is meant to be read, including multi-column layouts and boxes
  • Alternative textimages, charts and logos carry a short description; decorative graphics are marked as artefacts
  • Tables with header rowseach cell can be related to its column and row header
  • Title, language, metadatathe document announces its title and language and carries author and date
  • Text layer instead of a scanthe text is real text, searchable and selectable; a scan needs text recognition first

What we deliver

What we do for you

Want to have PDFs made accessible, or accessible PDFs created from Word and PowerPoint? We take on Word and PowerPoint sources, text-heavy PDFs and, after review, forms, scans and plans.

Make documents accessible

  • Repair Word and PowerPoint templates (styles, headings, alternative text, tables) and export them as tagged PDFs
  • Tag existing PDFs: public notices, minutes, official gazettes, municipal newsletters, reports, brochures, for companies, for example product catalogues, data sheets and price lists
  • Alternative text: written by us and agreed with you where specialist knowledge is needed
  • Reading order, bookmarks, document title, language and metadata
  • Forms, scans and plans on request after we have seen them

Review the inventory and set priorities

  • List of your published documents: download area, notice board, citizen services, for companies the download and service pages of your website or shop
  • Sorting by the cut-off dates and exceptions of the applicable legal texts (for example 23 September 2018 for office files under the EU Directive and the Austrian laws, BGG and BITV 2.0 have no such exception; 28 June 2025 for office files and archives of consumer offerings under BFSG / BaFG; archive rule 23 September 2019 for public bodies under the EU Directive, the Austrian laws and BITV 2.0), the legal assessment stays with your organisation
  • Priority by use: forms and public notices first
  • Effort estimate per document type

Test report and record

  • One report per document: automated checks (veraPDF, PAC), manual checkpoints, screen-reader sample (NVDA)
  • Change log: what was changed, version, reviewer, date
  • Overview for the documents section of your accessibility statement and for enquiries from monitoring bodies
  • Delivery as tagged PDF plus the repaired source file where available

Ongoing instead of once

  • Publication rhythm: every set of council minutes, every issue of the newsletter
  • Training for your team on accessible Word and PowerPoint templates
  • Template set in your typeface and layout
  • Answers to reports of barriers about documents prepared within the deadline that applies to your body (for example two months under § 4(3) WZG and most Austrian state laws, four weeks in Burgenland, one month for federal bodies in Germany under § 12b(4) BGG; states and municipalities in Germany under state law)

What we do not promise

No tool and no provider can vouch for conformity. Test tools cover only the machine-checkable part of the requirements; the rest is checked by a person, with us too. What you receive is the documented test status of every file: what was checked, with which tool, with which result. Whether and how your organisation is obliged is not something we assess legally; we implement the technical standard and point to the legal texts.

How it works

How does the remediation work?

In five steps: you name documents, we assess them free of charge, you receive a quote by scope, we start with a pilot, and then deliver in the agreed rhythm.

  1. 1 · Your enquirySend us links to three to five typical, already published documents through the contact form. You can also e-mail files to office@compliance-kit.eu. For the first assessment please send only published versions or documents without personal data.
  2. 2 · First assessment, free of chargeDocument types, whether source files exist, effort per page, a proposal for the scope, within a few business days.
  3. 3 · Quote by scopePer page by complexity (text, tables, design) or as a package for a whole inventory; surcharge without source file; ongoing support on request.
  4. 4 · PilotWe start with a limited set, for example 10 to 20 documents. You check the result and the test reports.
  5. 5 · Delivery and operationTagged PDFs, test reports and repaired source files, then in the agreed rhythm.

Obligations · deadlines · standard

Who has to provide accessible documents?

Directive (EU) 2016/2102 requires every EU member state to ensure that the websites of public sector bodies meet the accessibility requirements; their content includes documents for download, with exceptions, for example for older office files and archives. Companies are covered by the European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882), implemented in Germany by the BFSG and in Austria by the BaFG, each since 28 June 2025, for certain consumer products and services. We show the national details for Austria and Germany; other member states on request. The legal texts are in our source archive and are read against the official versions. The following is a summary, not legal advice.

EU: Directive (EU) 2016/2102

  • The member states ensure that websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies are accessible (Art. 1(2), Art. 4). Documents and forms for download are part of the content (recital 19); by “office file formats” the Directive means documents such as PDF or Office files that are contained in websites but not primarily intended for the web (recital 26).
  • Exception: office file formats published before 23 September 2018, unless they are needed for active administrative processes (Art. 1(4)(a)). Archives that have neither been needed for active processes nor updated since 23 September 2019 are exempt as well (Art. 1(4)(h)).
  • Duty to publish an accessibility statement with a feedback mechanism and a link to the enforcement procedure (Art. 7); the member states monitor periodically (Art. 8).
  • Companies: Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) sets accessibility requirements for certain products and services for consumers; implemented in Germany by the BFSG and in Austria by the BaFG (see the country cards).

Austria: WZG, state laws, BaFG

  • Federal level: Web-Zugänglichkeits-Gesetz (WZG) for the federation and bodies predominantly financed or supervised by it (§ 2(1) WZG). States, municipalities and municipal associations: the state laws (for example StWZG, § 15b Upper Austrian ADG, § 12 Lower Austrian ADG 2017); the state laws we examined set the same cut-off date for office files, 23 September 2018.
  • Standard: the harmonised standard EN 301 549. Accessibility statement along the EU model; reports of barriers must be answered within two months (§ 4(3) WZG and most of the state laws we examined; Burgenland: four weeks, § 59(3) Bgld. GADG). Monitoring: FFG and the states.
  • No penalty provision for the web duties, neither in the WZG nor in the web provisions of the state laws we examined; the FFG states that the EU Directive and the WZG provide for no sanctions or penalties. The consequence of the web duties is a complaint with recommendations for action, and monitoring. The anti-discrimination rules remain unaffected (the BGStG for the federation and the states’ anti-discrimination acts) with their own consequences, such as damages after an attempt at conciliation.
  • Companies: Barrierefreiheitsgesetz (BaFG) since 28 June 2025 for certain products and consumer services, including e-commerce; office files published before that date are exempt (§ 2(3) no. 2); micro-enterprises are exempt for services (§ 6(1)); administrative fines up to EUR 80,000 (§ 36).

Germany: BGG, BITV 2.0, BFSG

  • Federal bodies: § 12a BGG and BITV 2.0; § 2a BITV 2.0 expressly counts documents embedded in a website as part of the website. BITV 2.0 has no exception for older office files; only archives not needed for active processes and not edited since 23 September 2019 are exempt (§ 2(2) no. 2). States and municipalities are covered by the state laws.
  • Federal bodies: accessibility statement (§ 12b BGG, § 7 BITV 2.0) with a feedback contact; feedback must be answered within one month (§ 12b(4) BGG). Enforcement via the free conciliation body (§ 16 BGG) and representative action (§ 15 BGG). BGG and BITV 2.0 contain no fines.
  • Companies: Barrierefreiheitsstärkungsgesetz (BFSG) since 28 June 2025 for certain products and consumer services listed in § 1(2) and (3), including e-commerce services (§ 1(3) no. 5); office file formats published before 28 June 2025 are exempt (§ 1(4) no. 2); micro-enterprises are exempt for services (§ 3(3)); fines up to EUR 100,000 (§ 37).

The standard: EN 301 549 and WCAG 2.1 AA

The harmonised standard EN 301 549 (version V3.2.1) incorporates the WCAG 2.1 success criteria (for web content in clause 9, for documents in clause 10) and adds further criteria. PDF/UA (ISO 14289) is the established technical standard for accessible PDFs: not expressly prescribed by law, but the established way to implement the requirements in a PDF. We already take WCAG 2.2 into account.

How accessible are PDFs of public bodies today?

7 of 114

PDF documents passed the automated PAC test in Berlin in 2024, an achievement rate of 6.1 %.

Berlin monitoring body, results 2024
0 %

of the 88 PDF documents tested in Berlin in 2023 passed; in 2022 it was 2.7 % of 73 documents.

Berlin monitoring body, results 2024
52.5 %

of the accessibility statements of the websites and apps sampled in the 2025 Austrian monitoring stated that individual barriers had not been removed because of a disproportionate burden; several gave as the reason that PDF documents could not be published accessibly by default.

FFG, interim monitoring report 2025

Frequently asked

Frequently asked questions about accessible PDFs and documents

What does it cost to have a PDF made accessible?

It depends on volume and complexity: text pages, tables, design pages, whether source files exist. The first assessment is free of charge; you receive a quote after we have seen the material, and we start with a pilot.

How long does it take?

Depends on volume. The first assessment comes within a few business days; the delivery date is part of the quote.

Do our PDFs have to be PDF/UA?

PDF/UA is not prescribed by law. BITV 2.0 (§ 3(2)), the BFSG (§ 4) and the WZG (§ 3(2)) tie the presumption of conformity to harmonised standards whose references are published in the Official Journal of the EU; Directive 2016/2102 names EN 301 549 for this (Art. 6). That standard requires the WCAG 2.1 success criteria for documents (clause 10). PDF/UA (ISO 14289) is the established technical way to implement this in a PDF. We deliver tagged PDFs along that standard and record the checks in the test report.

Do the duties apply to old documents too?

Under the EU Directive (Art. 1(4)(a)) and in Austria (§ 2(3)(a) WZG and the state laws), office files published before 23 September 2018 are exempt unless they are needed for active administrative processes. The federal BITV 2.0 in Germany has no such exception; states and municipalities in Germany are governed by their state laws. Under the EU Directive (Art. 1(4)(h)), the WZG (§ 2(3)(i)), the Austrian state laws we examined and BITV 2.0 (§ 2(2) no. 2), archives are exempt if they are neither needed for active administrative processes nor updated or revised after 23 September 2019. For companies under the BFSG and BaFG the date is 28 June 2025: office files published before that date are exempt, as are archives whose content is neither updated nor revised after it (§ 1(4) nos. 2 and 5 BFSG, § 2(3) nos. 2 and 5 BaFG). Anything still in use belongs on the list.

Which documents first?

Whatever citizens need for a procedure: forms, public notices, minutes, current information. Then the regularly published items such as newsletters and reports. We propose the order in the first assessment.

We only have the finished PDF, no source file. Is that possible?

Yes. We tag existing PDFs; with the source file the result is better and cheaper, which is why we ask for it. Scans need text recognition first. We clarify that in the first assessment.

What is in the test report?

Per document: the result of the automated checks (veraPDF, PAC), the manual checkpoints (reading order, alternative text, tables, bookmarks, title and language), a screen-reader sample with NVDA, and the change log with version, reviewer and date. The report is written so that it fits the documents section of your accessibility statement.

Do municipalities face penalties?

Austria: neither the WZG nor the web provisions of the state laws we examined contain a penalty provision; the FFG states that the EU Directive and the WZG provide for no sanctions or penalties. The consequence is a complaint to the competent body, recommendations for action and monitoring; the anti-discrimination acts remain unaffected. Germany: for federal bodies, BGG and BITV 2.0 contain no fines; enforcement there runs via conciliation (§ 16 BGG) and representative action (§ 15 BGG). Municipalities are governed by the respective state law, which we do not cover here. We do not advertise with penalties. The reason is access, and findability.

Can we create accessible PDFs ourselves?

Yes, for new documents created from Word or PowerPoint with correct templates. We train your team and provide the templates. Existing inventories and complex layouts are what we take over.

Do you also work outside Austria and Germany?

Yes. For public bodies the same technical standard applies across the EU: the harmonised standard EN 301 549 under Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Art. 6); member states may go beyond the Directive’s minimum requirements (Art. 2). For documents the standard requires the WCAG 2.1 success criteria. PDF/UA (ISO 14289) is not expressly prescribed by law, but the established technical way to implement this in a PDF. The national implementing laws differ in details, for example in the exception for older documents. We remediate documents in German and English, other languages by arrangement. We present the national legal details for Austria and Germany; for other member states on request.

Is this legal advice?

No. We implement a technical standard and document it. Whether and how your organisation is obliged is a question for your legal department or counsel.

Who is Compliance-Kit?

Compliance-Kit, based in Vienna, makes PDF, Word and PowerPoint documents accessible for public bodies and companies across the EU, with a focus on Austria and Germany. We also produce compliance documentation and e-learnings for companies in Germany and Austria (GDPR, EU AI Act, NIS2, whistleblower protection, anti-discrimination) and check every legal statement against the official full texts.

Get started

Name three documents.

Links to three to five published documents via the contact form, or files by e-mail. For the first assessment please send only published versions or documents without personal data. The first assessment is free and without obligation. We answer on business days.

If you encounter a barrier on this website, write to office@compliance-kit.eu. We review your report and fix the barrier wherever it is within our control.

Standardised document service on the basis of your material. It does not include a legal assessment of your individual case and does not replace legal advice.